Bangkok Governor: The Surprise Win

Top poster: Democrat Party – Bangkok can move forward immediately – Please vote no. 16 Mr.Sukhumbhand Paribatra – www.sukhumbhand.com
Bottom poster: Please vote Pol Gen Pongsapat Pongcharoen No. 9 – Pheu Thai Party

[After months of polls driving home the fact that the Bangkok Governor’s race was a shoo-in for the Pheu Thai,
AND after claims from Thaksin that his party could run an electric pole and still beat the Democrats,
AND after the press nearly universally writing somber articles on how the Democrats got stuck with such a dud candidate as Sukhumbhand,
AND after an array of exit polls confidently showed the Pheu Thai ahead,
the Democrat candidate, Sukhumbhand Paribatra, not only won, but apparently won by a record number of votes compared to past winners.

We all should have known. Polling in past governor races has been consistently wrong—-no, opposite to reality. They usually showed the opposition Democrats heading to crushing defeat with the Pheu Thai (or other Thaksin-associated party at the time) taking on a studied air of confidence and boastfulness about the inevitability of its win. Still, after all these years, and with more sources of polling that ever, it speaks volumes that Thai polls are not only wrong, but appear bent to serve a political purpose.

The Thai polling bodies can once again hang their heads in shame. Already sheepishly blaming the respondents (who they say lied to them), pollsters in Thailand has been suspect ever since the Thai Rak Thai days when rumors began circulating that polls were compromised (like everything else) for political ends. Political parties across the spectrum have been suspected of getting their supporters to fabricate answers. Another contributing theory is that it does not take much to prod a Thai to give an answer they think you want to hear—-especially on politics. Regardless of the actual reason, the first thing any Thai analyst will tell you is “don’t trust the polls” and the events of today underline this.

This win certainly puts pressure on the government. The shock January 29 protest against the Yingluck government, led by a splinter Red Shirt faction, was quieted by the public admonitions from Red Shirt leaders to wait for the inevitable Pheu Thai triumph in the Bangkok governor’s race. With a win in the bag, it meant the main obstacle to the democratically elected government rewriting the rules to enable amnesty for all would be gone.

This win preserves the unwritten rules of Thai politics that say the urban elite can cast judgement (i.e. protest or provoke a coup) against a government brought to power by rural votes and alliances, but which is seen to become too corrupt or power hungry. A win for the sitting government would have signaled that the Bangkok elite approved of the government and had no justification to protest its actions.

The Democrat win (continuing the scenario of Bangkok residents electing a candidate from the opposition), means a disappointed Red Shirt rank and file and might lead to further dissension within the movement.

So instead of heating up another round of movement on amnesty and pardons, the Bangkok governor’s race maintains the balance of power. The government, since its reshuffle last year, has made every signal that it intends to play it safe and ensure its longevity, building on the stellar popularity of Yingluck that has refused to fall as was typically been expected of prime ministers of the past.

The next move is Thaksin’s. He has to continue to move towards a situation where he can return to the country and to power. With the Pheu Thai already leading the government, angry street protests once again demanding blood and thus amnesty for all are impossible.

With his allies in the government resigning themselves to the status quo of popularity, holding power, and spending money, it will make it that much harder to start to rock the boat again by demanding amnesty.

Whether this win can serve as the beginning of a rebuilding of the Democrat Party brand and popularity is anyone’s guess. Democrat Party head Abhisit and reelected Bangkok Governor Sukhumbhand are reportedly not on speaking terms. The rural public’s infatuation with the Pheu Thai does not seem to be waning. At the very least the win should cheer those previously resigned to the inevitable steamrolling popularity and influence of the Pheu Thai.]

This entry was posted in Analysis, Elections. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Bangkok Governor: The Surprise Win

  1. Anonymous says:

    ASTV said even after the hard won victory for Democrat, Democrat will have seriously hard time during the upcoming BMA City Council and District Council due to a Million voters of Big Judy — Democrat may have to apply the fear factor again in addition to find the potential candidates … and Thepthek [the King maker] will have to come up with strategy to ensure that PT men will not get more members for BMA city council/district councils who can give Sukhumband truly hard time and headaches for the second term.
    http://www.manager.co.th/Politics/ViewNews.aspx?NewsID=9560000026616

  2. Wiz says:

    The analysis for 50 districts has found that
    1. The victory for Democrat is due to the victory of Democrat in Minburi which is PT fiefdom – the azure chili (Big Judy got 27,327 votes vs. Sukhumband 28,744 votes)
    2. PT men won ONLY 12 districts – Dusit, Nongchok, Bang Khen, Lad krabang, Nong Khaem, Bangsue, Laksi, Donmueang, Saimai, Khannayao, Klong Sam Wah
    3. PT men narrowly defeat democrat men in Klong Sam Wah -> just a margin of 707 votes (Big Judy got 35,758 votes vs. MR Moo 35,051 votes)
    4. ONLY Donmeuang and Saimai district are showing that Big Judy won by widest margin … due to the strongholds of UDD men and the unforgettable flood of 2011
    http://thaiinsider.info/news2012b/the-news/politics/21919–707

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>